J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 55(7); 2014 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2014;55(7):963-968.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2014.55.7.963    Published online July 15, 2014.
Outcomes of Small Incision Lenticule Extraction: Mild to Moderate Myopia versus High Myopia.
Jae Ryun Kim, Hyun Seung Kim, Su Joung Mun, Young Taek Chung
1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea.
2Onnuri Eye Clinic, Jeonju, Korea. eyegreen@eyegreen.com
경도 및 중등도 근시환자와 고도근시환자에서의 스마일수술 임상성적 비교
김재련1⋅김현승1⋅문수정2⋅정영택2
Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Science, The Catholic University of Korea College of Medicine1, Seoul, Korea Onnuri Eye Clinic2, Jeonju, Korea
Abstract
PURPOSE
To evaluate the refractive outcomes of small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE) in high myopia patients compared with mild to moderate myopia patients. METHODS: This study included 332 eyes of 166 myopic patients treated with SMILE using Visumax 500 kHz femtosecond laser. Treated eyes were divided into 2 groups according to preoperative spherical equivalent (SE): mild to moderate myopia (A group, <-6.0 D) and high myopia (B group, > or =-6.0 D). Follow-up visits were at 1 day, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. The outcome measures included uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BDVA), postoperative SE, efficacy index, safety index and predictability. RESULTS: Preoperative SE was -4.85 +/- 0.86 D in the A group and -7.70 +/- 1.0 D in the B group. No differences were observed between -0.04 +/- 0.29 D in the A group and -0.30 +/- 0.37 D in the B group at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.062). At 6 months postoperatively, 98.3% and 97.3% had UDVA of 20/25 or better in the A group and B group, respectively. In the A group, 97.3% and 100% were within +/-0.5 D and +/-1.0 D of intended correction and in the B group, 91.7% and 96.9% were within +/-0.5 D and +/-1.0 D, respectively. Efficacy indices were 1.02 +/- 0.19 in the A group and 0.99 +/- 0.18 in the B group. Safety indices were 1.16 +/- 0.16 in the A group and 1.14 +/- 0.16 in the B group. The efficacy and safety indices were not significantly different between the A and B groups at 6 months postoperatively (p = 0.09, p = 0.695, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This study showed that SMILE is effective and safe for correcting high myopia as well as mild to moderate myopia.
Key Words: Best corrected distance visual acuity;High myopia;SMILE;Uncorrected distance visual acuity


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next