Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2003;44(5):1180-1187.
Published online May 1, 2003.
The Effect of Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor on Vascularization in Porous Polyethylene Orbital Implant (Medpor(R)).
Yong Sik Choi, Hye Bin Yim, Woong Chul Choi
1Department of Ophthalmology, Our Lady of Mercy Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Korea. yimhb@catholic.ac.kr
2Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary's Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, College of Medicine, Korea.
혈관 내피세포 성장인자가 다공성 안와 삽입물 (Medpor(R))의 혈관화에 미치는 영향
최용식 ( Yong Sik Choi ) , 임혜빈 ( Hye Bin Yim ) , 최웅철 ( Woong Chul Choi )
Abstract
PURPOSE
We investigated the effect of VEGF usage and the method of surgery on the vascularization rate of the porous orbital implant (Medpor(R)). METHODS: Thirty six Newzealand white rabbits were randomized into 2 groups according to the method of surgery (evisceration and intrascleral implantation and evisceration and retroscleral implantation). Each group was subdivided into two groups, a group treated with VEGF, and the other without VEGF treatment. The degree of vascularization was observed in the four groups at 1, 2, 4 weeks by using cryofilm transfer kit (Finetec, Tokyo, Japan). The implant was sliced at the equator with cryomicrotome and stained with Hematoxylin and Eosin, Masson's trichrome and reticulin. The sample was observed to assay the degree of fibrovascular ingrowth with light microscope. RESULTS: The group in which VEGF was used and the implant was inserted retrosclerally (n=9) showed significantly higher vascularization rate than the other three groups (P<0.05). Vascularization rate of the implant was significantly higher in the group in which VEGF was used (n=18). The rate was 83.6% compared to 64.2% in the control group (P<0.05). Different methods of surgery also showed significant difference. The rate of vascularization was 64.8% in the intrascleral inserted group (n=18) compared to 82.9% in the retroscleral inserted group (P<0.05). However, there was no difference in the vasculariztion rate at different time of observation (p>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: After using VEGF or inserting the implant retrosclerally, the vascularization of the implant was significantly incresed.
Key Words: Medpor(R);VEGF (vascular endothelial growth factor);Vascularization rate


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next