Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 1991;32(5):364-370.
Published online May 1, 1991.
Clinical Comparison of the Pulsair Pneumotonometer, Oculab Tono-pen and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
Hye Bin Yim, Hyung Il Kim, Choun Ki Joo, Ki Bong Kim
1Department of Ophthalmology, Catholic University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
2Department of Ophthalmology Kangnarn St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
3Department of Ophthalmology, St. Mary's Hospital, Catholic University Medical College, Seoul, Korea.
Pulsair 비접촉성안압계 , Oculab Tono - pen 및 Goldmann 압평 안압계의 임상적 비교
임혜빈(Hye Bin Yim),김형일(Hyung Il Kim),주천기(Choun Ki Joo),김기봉(Ki Bong Kim)
Abstract
IOP was measured with 3 different tools, namely, the Pulsair peumotonometer(A), the Oculab Tono-pen(B), and the Goldmann applanation tonometer(C), in order to evaluate the clinical usefulness of each. 174 eyes without corneal opacity and corneal edema were measured. The results were as follows; 1. The correlation coefficient was 0.85(P<0.005) between A and C, 0.82(P<0.005) between B and C and 0.83(P<0.005) between A and B. The correlative formulas between the measurements of IOPs were produced to be: A = 0.73 X C + 5.49, B = 0.76 X C + 5.33, A = 0.78 X B + 3.87. 2. At low IOPs(<10 mmHg) as Measured by C(11 eyes), the correlation Coefficient was 0.81(P<0.05) between B and C. However, A and B valuse tended to be highter than C value. 3. At relatively high IOPs(>20 mmHg)as measured by C(56 eyes), the correleation coefficient was 0.83 between A and C(P<0.0001) and 0.82(P<0.0001) between B and C. However, A and B values tended to be lower than c value. 4. At relatively high IOPs(>20 mmHg)as measurde by C, the sensitivity of A was 60.53% and that of B was 73.68%. According to this study, no significant difference could be found among these three tools. However, at low IOPs(<10 mmHg), the Oculab Tono-pen and Pulsair pneumotonometer tended to show higher values than the Goldmann applanation tonometer. In case of relatively high IOPs(>20 mmHg as measured by the Goldman tonometer), the Oculab Tono-pen and Pulsair pneumotonometer tended to show lower values than the Goldmana applanation tono meter and the sensitivity of the Oculab Tono-pen showed higher than that of the Pulsair pneumotonomer.
Key Words: Goldmann applanation tonometer;IOPs;intraocular pressures;Oculab Tono-pen;Pulsair pneumotonometer


ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next