J Korean Ophthalmol Soc > Volume 50(6); 2009 > Article
Journal of the Korean Ophthalmological Society 2009;50(6):821-825.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3341/jkos.2009.50.6.821    Published online June 15, 2009.
Canaliculitis Associated With SmartPlugtrade mark Punctal Plug Insertion: Clinical Features and Management.
Min Joung Lee, Kyeong Wook Lee, Nam Ju Kim, Ho Kyung Choung, Sang In Khwarg
1Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khwarg@snu.ac.kr
2Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
3Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
스마트 눈물점마개 삽입 후 발생한 눈물소관염의 임상양상과 치료
이민정1,2ㆍ이경욱1,2ㆍ김남주1,3ㆍ정호경1,4ㆍ곽상인1,2
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine1, Seoul, Korea / Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Hospital2, Seoul, Korea / Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital3, Seoul, Korea / Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Boramae Hospital4, Seoul, Korea
Abstract
PURPOSE
To report the clinical features and treatment of canaliculitis associated with SmartPlug punctal plug insertion. METHODS: Case selection criteria included patients with canaliculitis, who were managed at Seoul National University Hospital from January 2006 to October 2008, presenting with a history of punctal plug insertion. The operation reports were reviewed to identify patients in whom SmartPlug was discovered during the operation. Six patients (8 eyes) were identified, and a retrospective chart review was performed for all the patients. RESULTS: The mean age of the patients was 34.3+/-8.6 years, and there were 1 men and 5 women. Common symptoms were mucous discharge (6 eyes) and conjunctival injection (2 eyes). The mean time from insertion of the plug to onset of symptoms was 27.0+/-27.0 months (range 4 to 77 months). All patients underwent surgical removal of the punctal plug by one-snip punctoplasty, canalicular retrograde compression using 2 cotton-tipped applications (2 eyes), or canalicular curettage (6 eyes). All patients had resolution of symptoms after the procedure. CONCLUSIONS: Canaliculitis should be considered when there is conjunctival discharge or injection in patients with SmartPlug. One-snip punctoplasty and retrograde compression of canaliculus can be attempted preferentially as a minimally-invasive treatment option.
Key Words: Canaliculitis;Complication;Punctal plug;SmartPlug
TOOLS
METRICS Graph View
  • 2 Crossref
  •  0 Scopus
  • 728 View
  • 9 Download
Related articles

Lacrimal Gland Ductulitis: Clinical Features and Management.2013 July;54(7)



ABOUT
BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
SKY 1004 Building #701
50-1 Jungnim-ro, Jung-gu, Seoul 04508, Korea
Tel: +82-2-583-6520    Fax: +82-2-583-6521    E-mail: kos08@ophthalmology.org                

Copyright © 2024 by Korean Ophthalmological Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next