| Comparison of Effectiveness Between Intralesional Triamcinolone Injections and Incision and Curettage for the Primary Chalazia. |
|
Jong Wook Lee, Sung Jin Kim |
|
Department of Ophthalmology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. magneton@naver.com |
| 원발성 콩다래끼 환자에서 병소 내 트리암시놀론 주사요법과 절개배농술의 치료 효과 비교 |
|
이종욱⋅김성진 |
|
Department of Ophthalmology, Eulji University School of Medicine, Seoul, Korea |
|
|
| Abstract |
PURPOSE
To evaluate the effectiveness of intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection, and incision and curettage for primary chalazia. METHODS: In order to compare the effectiveness of treatment modality, 103 patients who were diagnosed with primary chalazia were divided into 2 groups. The patients in group A underwent intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection and the patients in group B underwent incision and curettage. The patients were followed up 1 week and 3 weeks after the procedures to identify the regression of the lesion and the procedure complications. A decision regarding success or failure was made at 3 and 6 weeks after the treatment. Successful treatment was defined as the infallibility in the functional and esthetic aspects as well as the size of regressed lesion. RESULTS: This study included 82 out of 103 patients, who satisfied the inclusion criteria. Forty-four patients underwent intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection and the remaining 38 patients underwent incision and curettage. The success rate of the initial treatment, which was identified 3 weeks after the procedure, was 81.8% in group A and 86.8% in group B. The cumulative success rate of treatment after 6 weeks was 86.8% in group A and 92.1% in group B. No complications were observed with both treatment modalities. CONCLUSIONS: Intralesional triamcinolone acetonide injection is as effective and safe as incision and curettage for the treatment of primary chalazia. |
| Key Words:
Chalazion;Incision and curettage;Intralesional triamcinolone injection |
|
PDF Links
Full text via DOI
Download Citation
