A Polypropylene Sheet as a Spacer Graft for the Correction of Lower Eyelid Retraction. |
Cheol Kim, Sang In Khwarg, Nam Ju Kim, Ho Kyung Choung, Young Ha Kim |
1Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea. khwarg@snu.ac.kr 2Department of Ophthalmology, Gwangju Veterans Hospital, Gwangju, Korea. 3Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute, Seoul, Korea. 4Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 5Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital, Seoul, Korea. 6Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology, Gwangju, Korea. |
아래눈꺼풀뒤당김 교정수술시 이식재료로서 폴리프로필렌 부직포의 이용에 관한 연구 |
김철1,2,곽상인1,3,김남주1,4,정호경1,5,김영하6 |
Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University College of Medicine1, Seoul, Korea, Department of Ophthalmology, Gwangju Veterans Hospital2, Gwangju, Korea, Seoul Artificial Eye Center, Seoul National University Hospital Clinical Research Institute3, Seoul, Korea, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital4, Seoul, Korea, Department of Ophthalmology, Seoul Municipal Boramae Hospital5, Seoul, Korea, Gwangju Institute of Science and Technology6, Gwangju, Korea |
Correspondence:
Cheol Kim, M.D.1,2 |
|
Abstract |
PURPOSE To evaluate the usefulness of a polypropylene non-woven sheet as a spacer graft for the correction of lower lid retraction METHODS: Fifteen New Zealand white rabbits were randomized into three groups. Polypropylene non-woven sheets were implanted between the tarsus and lower lid retractor via a transcutaneous approach (Group 1), a transconjunctival approach (Group 2), or a transconjunctival approach with amniotic membrane transplantation (Group 3). Numerous large pores were made in the sheet with a 21-gauge needle before implantation. Rabbits were sacrificed serially after 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks in each group. Gross and histologic examinations were performed. RESULTS: In Group 1, the polypropylene sheets stayed in place well, without any exposure on gross observation except at 2 weeks. In Group 2, the conjunctival wound was not healed on the polypropylene sheet, and the sheet was exposed to the ocular surface and extruded gradually. In Group 3, the conjunctival wound was well healed on the surface of polypropylene sheet, and the sheet remained stationary at 4, 6, and 8 weeks on gross examination. Histologic examinations showed gradual fibrovascular ingrowth into the polypropylene sheets in Groups 1 and 3, but not in Group 2, in which only severe inflammatory infiltrations were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The polypropylene non-woven sheet is a good candidate for a spacer material in lower lid retraction operation, and either the transcutaneous approach or the use of an amniotic membrane is necessary for best postoperative outcome. |
Key Words:
Lower lid;Polypropylene;Recession;Retraction;Spacer |
|